Draft Tweak

[Wynne - Retired Flyers GM]

Don't think the auto pick should be changed.

[New York Rangers GM]

Sept 21, 2013 14:08:47 GMT -5 Wynne - Retired Flyers GM said:

Don't think the auto pick should be changed.

New York Rangers GM likes this.

[Justin]

Sept 21, 2013 1:35:50 GMT -5 New York Rangers GM said:

Sept 21, 2013 1:16:55 GMT -5 Justin said:

It's kind of funny. There was a good discussion going on here about what we should do with the draft, fixing a problem, we were all getting down to the nitty gritty of what we wanted to do moving forward, then Kruze came in, Kruzed it up, turned it into a bitch fest and it died....


So...are we cool with with absent GMs with no-list picking at the end of each round, THEN the bonus picks coming AFTER that? Good?

Look dude... You asked for members thoughts and opinions, and I offered mine. It's not my fault if you don't like that I disagreed with your suggestions. Next time if you don't want opinions, don't ask for them. It's a simple equation.

Just assume I am never interested in your input on this site. It works better that way. Now go crawl back into your "Griswold" shell - you are acting kinda Kruze again right now.

[Colorado Avalanche GM]

We'll put this to a poll, I think. Majority rules.

[New York Rangers GM]

Sept 22, 2013 5:35:39 GMT -5 Justin said:

Sept 21, 2013 1:35:50 GMT -5 New York Rangers GM said:

Look dude... You asked for members thoughts and opinions, and I offered mine. It's not my fault if you don't like that I disagreed with your suggestions. Next time if you don't want opinions, don't ask for them. It's a simple equation.

Just assume I am never interested in your input on this site. It works better that way. Now go crawl back into your "Griswold" shell - you are acting kinda Kruze again right now.

ROFL Who the hell else would I act like? I am Kruze. Fact is that you have a problem that I gave fair and concise reasoning for why I don't like this idea and that not everyone agrees with you that this is the right course of action. Also, you can just assume that I really don't give a rat's ass if you're interested in my opinion on this site or not. You asked for members' opinions. I'm a member. I gave my opinion. End of story.

But Avs is right, put it to a poll cuz there doesn't really seem to be a clear majority for either side on this one.

[55587crosby - Retired SJ GM]

That's a smooo00oove mooove

[Justin]

Poll is fine, but the only problem I see with the poll is the problem we are trying to solve seems to be a problem with the majority - we didn't have a lot of lists for the last draft. So it would be stupid of them to vote for a punishment for their own laziness. This is one of those things that affects the people that care, but not those that don't. That make sense?

Like if only 1 guy ever sent in a keeper list, and we put up a poll for if we should punish the other 29 for not submitting keeper lists...ya think 29 guys are gonna vote to punish themselves?

I am typically all for democracy, but this is one of the few things I think the staff should just resolve and we should move on it. Most of the staff at least either submit lists or were at the last draft(s), so they see the problem.

[The Admin Account]

We will figure this out ASAP.

[New Jersey Devils GM]

Think we should look at this again soon? At least get the convo going again before its a rush near the season's end.

Looking over what's been posted;

If you don't show up to the draft and haven't submitted a list you'll be skipped and at the end of EACH round the skipped teams will be auto'd, given the best player available/highest overall.


Are we keeping the keepers and draftees the same?

[Colorado Avalanche GM]

We were discussing about changing the keepers... once every couple of sim seasons to spice things up. I'm still down to do that.

[The Admin Account]

Yeah sorry, I was planning on getting this up tomorrow actually, when I'm finally fully free.