|
|
Post by Justin on Jan 28, 2013 22:16:55 GMT -5
To  C Logan Couture PLY 85 RW - Robert Nilsson (71) PLY C - Landon Ferraro (64) TWF To  Wild (this year) 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Wild (next year) 5th |
|
|
|
Post by Mike - Former Wild GM on Jan 28, 2013 22:17:44 GMT -5
Accepted. Time to do Logan's run with Randy Couture.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Jan 28, 2013 22:28:16 GMT -5
83, 82, 81, 80, 80 for 85, 71, 64.
On the fence...
|
|
|
|
Post by Justin on Jan 28, 2013 22:30:03 GMT -5
I won't be drafting 80s with those picks. I lose the deal, but I need depth.
Remember, I just got here and i don;t have that massive floor of protected guys most others have here. That is what I am trying to collect in this draft.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike - Former Wild GM on Jan 28, 2013 22:30:32 GMT -5
False. They are draft picks right now, they are not ratings. Any player at any rating can be selected with those picks. Don't believe me? Look at the Maple Leafs drafting formula.
|
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Red Wings GM on Jan 28, 2013 22:31:25 GMT -5
Reject.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike - Former Wild GM on Jan 28, 2013 22:31:55 GMT -5
You're mistaking me for the Blue Jackets, Wings, don't be mad.
|
|
|
|
Post by New York Islanders GM on Jan 28, 2013 22:31:59 GMT -5
False. They are draft picks right now, they are not ratings. Any player at any rating can be selected with those picks. Don't believe me? Look at the Maple Leafs drafting formula. Draft Picks have value of the ratings. I'm going to have to reject this one, make Nilsson a 80ish and I'll accept. |
|
|
|
Post by Justin on Jan 28, 2013 22:32:17 GMT -5
Who are we rejecting in favour of?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike - Former Wild GM on Jan 28, 2013 22:32:51 GMT -5
Alright. Pens, make Nilsson an 80 so he accepts. I didn't know rating modifications for deal approvals was an option, this opens a whole new avenue for trading!
|
|
|
|
Post by Justin on Jan 28, 2013 22:32:56 GMT -5
I'm going to have to reject this one, make Nilsson a 80ish and I'll accept. I don't HAVE an 80. I am not a "have", remember? |
|
|
|
Post by Justin on Jan 28, 2013 22:34:14 GMT -5
what if we add a damned clause saying I cannot draft anyone over 80. This is silly. Everyone here has a huge stock pile of guys who will never see the draft, that is what I am trying to collect in this trade, and you won;t let me do that.
It's actually difficult to acquire 75s here for damn sakes.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Jan 28, 2013 22:35:10 GMT -5
If you took out the two 5ths I would approve.
|
|
|
|
Post by Justin on Jan 28, 2013 22:37:05 GMT -5
Dude, that depth is why i want to do this trade. Quantity. I need bodies and there are like, 35 people I like in this draft. I want as many as I can get. they are not 80s.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Jan 28, 2013 22:38:10 GMT -5
Dude, that depth is why i want to do this trade. Quantity. I need bodies and there are like, 35 people I like in this draft. I want as many as I can get. they are not 80s. One of the 5ths is for next year's draft. |
|
