|
Post by Justin on Jan 28, 2013 22:39:16 GMT -5
And based on what everyone is saying, the 70 player I am after will be there next draft too.
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Jan 28, 2013 22:40:05 GMT -5
Oh my lord, you can get him for free then by just showing up and picking him in the damn bonus rounds. Not by trading Logan Couture.
|
|
|
Post by Justin on Jan 28, 2013 22:40:43 GMT -5
I PMed you about that. I cannot be here at that time.
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Jan 28, 2013 22:41:20 GMT -5
I PMed you about that. I cannot be here at that time. I already said you could send me a list for the bonus and I'd pick guys for you since your team needs players.
|
|
|
Post by Justin on Jan 28, 2013 22:42:19 GMT -5
I think this being rejected is sort of nuts. You are rejecting it based on what YOU would pick, not what I would pick. Everyone told me how easy trading was for lower level guys when I made my suggestion about Keepers, and now this simple trade for some 70-rated players is getting shit on. Whats wrong with adding the clause that I cannot take anyone rated over 81 with those picks?
|
|
|
Post by Justin on Jan 28, 2013 22:43:51 GMT -5
83, 82, 81, 80, 80 for 85, 71, 64. 82, 81, 80, 80 are all lost in next years draft, if you go by this logic. So they are 1 year renters. 85 is a keeper. 71 and 64 are low-locked.
|
|
|
Post by Wynne - Retired Flyers GM on Jan 28, 2013 22:43:56 GMT -5
Going to reject as it sits.
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Jan 28, 2013 22:45:18 GMT -5
Because you won't be taking 70s in rounds 2, 3 and 4. As I already said, take out the two 5ths and I'll accept.
|
|
|
Post by Mike - Former Wild GM on Jan 28, 2013 22:45:49 GMT -5
Well, I really want Couture. What is an appropriate trade of picks for Couture that you guys feel is acceptable?
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Jan 28, 2013 22:46:42 GMT -5
Well, I really want Couture. What is an appropriate trade of picks for Couture that you guys feel is acceptable? I literally have now said 9000 times this same deal without the two 5ths is acceptable.
|
|
|
Post by Justin on Jan 28, 2013 22:49:16 GMT -5
It's not worth me doing without the 5ths.
What was wrong with the "can't draft over-81s" clause?
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Jan 28, 2013 22:50:40 GMT -5
It's not worth me doing without the 5ths. What was wrong with the "can't draft over-81s" clause? We haven't allowed conditional trades here in the past, not about to start.
|
|
|
Post by Justin on Jan 28, 2013 22:54:01 GMT -5
So...you don;t allow me to DRAFT 75s, you don't allow me to TRADE for them, you don't allow me to trade PICKS to draft them....then after all that you won't let me protect them either......
This is absolute silliness. I WANT SOME 75s FOR FUCK SAKES.
Why is that hard?
Fine, toss Gordie fucking Howe in here. That work? Gordie Howe and everything above to I can have my god damned 70 overall players
|
|
|
Post by Mike - Former Wild GM on Jan 28, 2013 22:54:49 GMT -5
I accept that.
|
|
|
Post by Justin on Jan 28, 2013 23:08:23 GMT -5
so we good now? Is this nonsense resolved? Do I need to add a pair of testicles to this offer as well to get my 70-79 rated players?
|
|