|
|
Post by New York Rangers GM on Apr 1, 2014 9:37:31 GMT -5
TO:  G Mike Richter (88) *Legend* LW Alexandre Burrows TWF (85) D Jason Garrison TWD (85) C Zack Smith GRN (79) TO:  G Grant Fuhr (89) *Legend* RW Rene Bourque TWF (84) D Eric Brewer DFD (83) D Mark Fistric DFD (81) Just wanting to shuffle things up a bit and Richter's one of the remaining missing pieces to the '94 Rangers and I figured since Fuhr was a Blue at one time that it was the appropriate time to make this deal. I also need a depth centre for while Boyle is injured. I've had allot of fun with Fuhr as my goalie, but as Monty Python's Flying Circus says: "And now for something completely different". lol Accepts.
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Bruins GM on Apr 1, 2014 11:32:13 GMT -5
Overall wise it works but I don't like this deal for Blues.
Richter for Fuhr is fine. Bourque becomes a 4th line RW, Brewer is a downgrade and Fistric won't play.
|
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Avalanche GM on Apr 1, 2014 11:38:33 GMT -5
Yeah, the goalie swap on its own is okay but the rest is alittle off. Need a bit more going to STL.
|
|
|
|
Post by New York Rangers GM on Apr 1, 2014 11:47:31 GMT -5
Overall wise it works but I don't like this deal for Blues. Richter for Fuhr is fine. Bourque becomes a 4th line RW, Brewer is a downgrade and Fistric won't play.I disagree. With Burrows coming back this way, Bourque would slot in either into Burrows' spot on the 2nd line OR Williams would move up to the 2nd line and Bourque would be in on the 3rd line. If you go strictly by position Blues would basically look like this: Michalek 85 - Spezza 88 - Franzen 87 Williams 84 - Carter 88- Pominville 86 Bourque 84 - Little 84 - Kuznetsov 82 McGinn 80 - Cogliano 82 - Kennedy 82 Shore 91 - Suter 92 Brewer 83 - JayBo 86 Kindl 82 - Streit 82 With Fistric 81 being they're top defensive spare over Gormley 80. I mean, I see what you're trying to get at Bruins, but it's a bit unfounded. |
|
|
|
Post by Calgary Flames GM on Apr 1, 2014 14:20:11 GMT -5
I'm not liking it for the Blues.
Reject
|
|
|
|
Post by New York Rangers GM on Apr 1, 2014 14:32:35 GMT -5
I'm not liking it for the Blues. Reject And this coming from Mr. No-GM trade?! Are you serious?  lol You guys are insane...  |
|
|
|
Post by Calgary Flames GM on Apr 1, 2014 16:39:52 GMT -5
I at least make the overalls and positions the same or in the NO-GM team's favour.
|
|
|
|
Post by Florida Panthers GM on Apr 1, 2014 19:40:37 GMT -5
I'm not liking it for the Blues. Reject And this coming from Mr. No-GM trade?! Are you serious? lol You guys are insane... Lmao !! So true |
|
|
|
Post by New York Rangers GM on Apr 1, 2014 21:41:57 GMT -5
I at least make the overalls and positions the same or in the NO-GM team's favour. The overalls add up. No one loses any overall. |
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins GM on Apr 1, 2014 23:09:54 GMT -5
accepted, but remember position for position don't assume the game will make changes as it rarely does at all
|
|
|
|
Post by New York Rangers GM on Apr 1, 2014 23:35:49 GMT -5
accepted, but remember position for position don't assume the game will make changes as it rarely does at all In my experience it does to a point... I know it goes by some depth chart way as to who goes where when you hit best lines. But this was also the best senario so that I wasn't ripping the Blues off. I looked at a few different ways of doing it. |
|
|
|
Post by Justin on Apr 10, 2014 23:44:36 GMT -5
From here No-GM Trading Rules (found here): - 3 rejections = no deal. Looks like it'll need to be reworked. |
|
|
|
Post by New York Rangers GM on Apr 17, 2014 11:11:25 GMT -5
From here No-GM Trading Rules (found here): - 3 rejections = no deal. Looks like it'll need to be reworked. No, the only actual rejection came from Flames and Pens accepted it. Everyone else gave an analysis but no accept/reject. So that's actually: 1 Accept & 1 Reject. You really need to sharpen you math skills.  lol |
|
|
|
Post by Justin on Apr 17, 2014 20:08:57 GMT -5
Welp, when people say things like, "Need a bit more going to STL", and " I don't like this deal for Blues", those are rejects.
But I will help this along, in case you are still waiting for more input.
I reject.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tampa Bay Lightning GM on Apr 17, 2014 21:17:17 GMT -5
Here is your 3rd one:
REJECT.
There, now it officially goes into the rejected bin.
|
|
lol You guys are insane... 
lol
