|
|
Post by Calgary Flames GM on Mar 15, 2014 4:14:46 GMT -5
C Vincent Lecavalier PLY 86
LW Sergei Kostitsyn SNP 81
for
C Lars Eller PLY 84
LW Nikolai Kulemin SNP 84
Canes gain an overall.
I accept
|
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins GM on Mar 15, 2014 17:15:00 GMT -5
this only hurts the Canes. they would be left an 80 an there second line center and they have a lot of LWers
|
|
|
|
Post by Calgary Flames GM on Mar 15, 2014 21:29:24 GMT -5
I could change Tanguay with Eller.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins GM on Mar 16, 2014 19:20:22 GMT -5
so change it then and I will accept it
|
|
|
|
Post by Calgary Flames GM on Mar 16, 2014 19:28:18 GMT -5
Switched Tanguay with Eller.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins GM on Mar 16, 2014 21:17:10 GMT -5
accepted
|
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Avalanche GM on Mar 16, 2014 21:39:24 GMT -5
Hmm.
Acceptable.
|
|
|
|
Post by Justin on Mar 16, 2014 21:41:07 GMT -5
The primary problem I have with this has to do with Lecavalier. He is currently occupying Canes final Keeper spot. If you downgrade him to an 84, they are dropping their final keeper spot from a reputable 86 player to a who-cares 84. The trade-off doesn't really provide them with any upgrades they need, as they downgrade 2 at C and only upgrade 1 on their current 2nd line LW (MacArthur).
84s are "lose to the draft" players, 86s are protect players. I do not mean this as in "rejected because he will lose Eller to the draft" I mean it in terms of the quality of the player. YOu can draft any old 84 ina draft, but an 86 is a 1st round-calibre player. In essence, Carolina is wasting a protect on a 2nd round player.
I hope I explained that in a way that makes sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by Florida Panthers GM on Mar 22, 2014 22:05:11 GMT -5
So what's the verdict here ?
|
|
|
|
Post by Calgary Flames GM on Mar 22, 2014 22:06:40 GMT -5
Eller was used in auctions to pick up Berglund
Rejected/finalized
|
|
