|
|
Post by Justin on Mar 10, 2014 21:41:20 GMT -5
To Flyers
RW Brett Hull SNP 90
G Felix Potvin 87
D Cam Fowler OFD 81
D John-Michael Liles OFD 81
G Eddie Lack 81
RW Nikolay Zherdev SNP 75
LW Linus Omark PLY 75
LW Nikita Filatov SNP 74
To Canes
RW Marian Gaborik SNP 90
G Craig Anderson 86
D Chris Phillips DFD 85
C Jiri Tlusty PLY 84
D Michal Stone TWD 81
D Michal Rozsival TWD 81
LW John Gaudreau SNP 79
|
|
|
|
Post by Calgary Flames GM on Mar 10, 2014 22:08:52 GMT -5
Lol you badly want those players
|
|
|
|
Post by Justin on Mar 10, 2014 22:52:10 GMT -5
I liked my whole team as Carolina. A lot. I just cannot stand the damned Hurricanes, so I needed a change. (I also gave up a protect slot to keep Forsberg when I took over in Philly too) I like players I like  |
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Avalanche GM on Mar 11, 2014 0:10:14 GMT -5
I still don't like the players ending up in Carolina.
Philly is getting two really good "potential" players in Fowler and Lack. Most likely going up in rating.
Meanwhile, Gaborik is most likely going to go down in rating. Anderson is decent but him and Potvin are the same. For the sake of argument, Gaborik and Hull also cancel out here.
Yes, you're taking on Liles and a few others scrubs but those are just depth pieces. Tlusty is nice but he's not on the same level that Lack and Fowler are. I think if you take out either one (or both) of Fowler and Lack, I'd be more willing to accept. Or, give up better "potential" guys to Carolina.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins GM on Mar 11, 2014 0:12:25 GMT -5
I like this one I'll accept it
|
|
|
|
Post by Justin on Mar 11, 2014 9:22:02 GMT -5
I still don't like the players ending up in Carolina. Philly is getting two really good "potential" players in Fowler and Lack. Most likely going up in rating. Meanwhile, Gaborik is most likely going to go down in rating. Anderson is decent but him and Potvin are the same. For the sake of argument, Gaborik and Hull also cancel out here. Yes, you're taking on Liles and a few others scrubs but those are just depth pieces. Tlusty is nice but he's not on the same level that Lack and Fowler are. I think if you take out either one (or both) of Fowler and Lack, I'd be more willing to accept. Or, give up better "potential" guys to Carolina. What is Lack's potential? In 3-4 seasons (6-7 real months) he goes up to 86? 87? Carolina has another starting goalie in Ron Hextall. They have a decent back up in Anderson, and they have Thomas Vokoun. Sure, some overalls will change, but I think it's kind of silly to lock up all No-GM trades simply because of hypotheticals based on players that have no impact on the team now, nor when the new game comes out (in many seasons). Like the other trade, this one clearly feeds Carolina's needs (defence) while taking from their surplus (goaltending) and this time I didn't even ask for an 86 in return. |
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Mar 12, 2014 9:56:50 GMT -5
I still don't like the players ending up in Carolina. Philly is getting two really good "potential" players in Fowler and Lack. Most likely going up in rating. Meanwhile, Gaborik is most likely going to go down in rating. Anderson is decent but him and Potvin are the same. For the sake of argument, Gaborik and Hull also cancel out here. Yes, you're taking on Liles and a few others scrubs but those are just depth pieces. Tlusty is nice but he's not on the same level that Lack and Fowler are. I think if you take out either one (or both) of Fowler and Lack, I'd be more willing to accept. Or, give up better "potential" guys to Carolina. Carolina has another starting goalie in Ron Hextall. They have a decent back up in Anderson, and they have Thomas Vokoun. Sure, some overalls will change, but I think it's kind of silly to lock up all No-GM trades simply because of hypotheticals based on players that have no impact on the team now, nor when the new game comes out (in many seasons). Like the other trade, this one clearly feeds Carolina's needs (defence) while taking from their surplus (goaltending) and this time I didn't even ask for an 86 in return. I was thinking like 80-81 lol. This goalie logic is classic Mike Gillis, if you keep doing that, you'll go from Luongo and Schneider to Markstrom and Lack! But seriously, I'm more focused on the top pieces, which matter most, which still haven't changed. So it's still a no from me. |
|
|
|
Post by Calgary Flames GM on Mar 12, 2014 14:00:11 GMT -5
You need 2 admins to accept a No-GM trade but Isles rejected.
Rejected/finalized
|
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins GM on Mar 12, 2014 14:52:44 GMT -5
yes it is Finalized as it stands
|
|
