|
|
Post by Justin on Jan 11, 2014 1:23:13 GMT -5
Option 1: 11 Default keepers. (89 and under: 1 slot, 90: 2 slots, 91-94: 3 slots, 95+: 4 slots) Option 2: 16 Default keepers. (86 and under: 1 slot, 87-89: 2 slots, 90-92: 3 slots, 93-94: 4 slots, 95+: 5 slots) Option 3: 18 Default keepers. (86 and under: 1 slot, 87-89: 2 slots, 90-92: 3 slots, 93-94: 4 slots, 95+: 5 slots) but goaltenders are NOT automatically protected each season as they have been in the past with this option. Please vote ASAP and let's get this thing rollin'! 
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Jan 11, 2014 2:54:04 GMT -5
Please note, if option 1 wins without a majority, a new poll will be conducted based on the 2nd place choice vs option 1.
|
|
|
|
Post by Justin on Jan 11, 2014 3:16:52 GMT -5
Please note, if option 1 wins without a majority, a new poll will be conducted based on the 2nd place choice vs option 1. I don't think that makes any sense. These 3 options are different enough that we can just take the damned winner, and MOVE ON. That added stipulation just makes it sound like you're tossing up another barrier to an option you dislike (whether that is the case or not, that is definitely how it looks). There is no need to drag it out another round, regardless of what wins. As Pittsburgh Penguins GM has said several times, we need to get this done and move forward, so people have time to trade accordingly. |
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins GM on Jan 11, 2014 13:10:07 GMT -5
there will be no more polls on this guys, Not a chance. Everybody didn't want this one. This will be a final decision
|
|
|
|
Post by Calgary Flames GM on Jan 11, 2014 13:14:00 GMT -5
What does it mean by 89 and under??
|
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Avalanche GM on Jan 11, 2014 13:27:37 GMT -5
Players rated 89 and lower.
|
|
|
|
Post by Calgary Flames GM on Jan 11, 2014 14:54:07 GMT -5
I wasn't really thinking. It's saying that if you keep an 89 or lower player they will only take up one slot. I get it now.
|
|
|
|
Post by New York Rangers GM on Jan 12, 2014 15:11:00 GMT -5
Goalies are auto protected under options 1 &2, correct?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Jan 12, 2014 15:12:36 GMT -5
Goalies are auto protected under options 1 &2, correct? yes |
|
|
|
Post by New York Rangers GM on Jan 12, 2014 15:17:49 GMT -5
Meh... none of these are still all that appealing.
|
|
|
|
Post by New York Rangers GM on Jan 12, 2014 16:08:53 GMT -5
Meh... none of these are still all that appealing. I'll actually show you what I mean when I get home and not on my phone. lol |
|
|
|
Post by Mike - Former Wild GM on Jan 13, 2014 8:32:30 GMT -5
Meh... none of these are still all that appealing. I'll actually show you what I mean when I get home and not on my phone. lol Did.... did kruze just talk to himself to explain something to himself in a future conversation with himself...? |
|
|
|
Post by Justin on Jan 13, 2014 22:54:37 GMT -5
Yes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike - Former Wild GM on Jan 16, 2014 10:22:25 GMT -5
So when does this close?
|
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins GM on Jan 17, 2014 0:52:02 GMT -5
I think it has been up long enough and there isn't enough votes left to change the outcome now anyway
|
|
