Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2014 0:31:38 GMT -5
To Ottawa
C Pierre Turgeon PLY 88 *Legend* LW Michel Goulet SNP 87 *Legend* C Guy Carbonneau TWF 87 *Legend* D Alex Goligoski OFD 83
To Phoenix
C Igor Larionov PLY 88 *Legend* LW Vladimir Krutov SNP 88 *Legend* RW Sergei Makarov SNP 88 *Legend* D Jonas Brodin TWD 81
I accept.
|
|
|
Post by Tampa Bay Lightning GM on Jan 2, 2014 1:21:38 GMT -5
Not feelin' this. Sens lose their only legitimate RW player and take downgrades in the top 6.
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins GM on Jan 2, 2014 2:34:54 GMT -5
have to agree with TB on this one
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2014 2:51:10 GMT -5
My thinking is, that forward positions don't matter a whole lot. The majority of teams that I have seen have centers playing wing and that's all this deal does.
The overalls are even and the Sens get Alex Goligoski, who if I remember correctly is a very good producer.
They don't give up a whole lot on forward (other then just losing a position player) and upgrade their D pretty good.
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins GM on Jan 2, 2014 2:56:31 GMT -5
If it was a team with a manager I wouldn't have a problem as they could adjust there roster, but EA does a horrible just with best line. They did a good job in 09 or 10 but have sucked badly ever since. If I had a RW to trade you I would but these are difficult with EA now.
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Jan 2, 2014 3:13:33 GMT -5
rejected and finalized.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2014 3:45:17 GMT -5
Just curious, but how do you complete a non-gm here then?
Overalls were even. It's a fair deal, but it gets rejected because a guy is a C instead of a RW? Seems sorta stupid. C's play anywhere, about like 85% of the league has C's playing W.
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Jan 2, 2014 3:48:04 GMT -5
Just curious, but how do you complete a non-gm here then? Overalls were even. It's a fair deal, but it gets rejected because a guy is a C instead of a RW? Seems sorta stupid. C's play anywhere, about like 85% of the league has C's playing W. Make the deal worthwhile for the Non-GM. They have no reason to downgrade their top players for a slight upgrade on a player that they'll lose to the draft.
|
|