|
Post by The Admin Account on Nov 18, 2012 4:55:09 GMT -5
While we wait for Calgary and Chicago to eventually get new GMs, how would you all feel about me making auction bids on their behalf?
Essentially my plan is to only upgrade their players when I can. A ton of spare guys end up being left without bids on them usually and slowly but surely these teams could be built to be more respectable solely through auctions while we wait for a GM to come and take over.
Thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by Wynne - Retired Flyers GM on Nov 18, 2012 16:29:14 GMT -5
Do it.
|
|
|
Post by C00kies - Retired Kings GM on Nov 18, 2012 16:44:43 GMT -5
So you'd only be doing it for the non-bidded guys (like the 76s)? I'm all for it.
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Nov 18, 2012 18:10:38 GMT -5
So you'd only be doing it for the non-bidded guys (like the 76s)? I'm all for it. Yeah that was my plan.
|
|
|
Post by C00kies - Retired Kings GM on Nov 18, 2012 18:29:50 GMT -5
What about ones that have the current leading bid at 75 for an 80 player? I know we don't want to rip off current GMs, but that is a good chance to improve these non-GM teams and make them more attractive.
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Nov 18, 2012 19:41:42 GMT -5
What about ones that have the current leading bid at 75 for an 80 player? I know we don't want to rip off current GMs, but that is a good chance to improve these non-GM teams and make them more attractive. Would do that too. Essentially go for upgrades only
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Nov 20, 2012 0:02:07 GMT -5
appears to have disappeared as well and only has 5 defensemen so I'll be doing this for them also
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins GM on Nov 27, 2012 19:28:53 GMT -5
great job on those. Might as well make those teams alittle more competitive
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Nov 27, 2012 19:56:10 GMT -5
Yup, now since they all have GMs they got a bit of a head-start in helping their teams improve
|
|