Adjust player overall

[Colorado Avalanche GM]

What do you think of doing something similiar like in Spitty's league.

Let's say, at the beginning of the season, you choose 3 players. Any 3 guys off your roster. Based on a set criteria prior to the season, they can either gain or lose overall.
So, say I choose Player Sandman.
Sandman, rated 85, plays 70 games, gets 45 points.
In the set criteria that we determine, 45 points is too little to gain overall for a player of such overall. Therefore, Sandman loses an overall and is now an 84.

It's kinda risky, but kinda interesting. Perhaps for that season we give legends or rookies a break and go with this? Something new? Something different?

By set criteria I mean this:
Players rated 80-82: 0-30 points = 1 overall loss. 31-50 points = 1 overall gain. 51+ = 2 overall gain. (would be different for D-man/goalies?)

yay or nay?

[Toronto Maple Leafs GM]

I kinda like it.

[The Admin Account]

Not really a fan tbh. More work for Yotes and more stuff to keep track of.

[Pittsburgh Penguins GM]

It woudn't be difficult to do, but just a heads up to everybody thinking this would help. If a player is rated 83 and is producing in the game and you change him to an 85-87, he will usually not perform as well as he use to and I defnitly can't change them back to what they were and work out well.

[Wynne - Retired Flyers GM]

Nay

[New York Islanders GM]

If we were to do this, it should have been something from the start, not introduced in Season 21. And there's a reason we're in Season 21, let's stick with that.

[Colorado Avalanche GM]

There's also a reason why legends and rookies are introduced, why gm awards were scrapped, etc.

And it's not because we've stuck with it.

[55587crosby - Retired SJ GM]

I say this should be only done to rookies upto three years of being introduced. it raises their values as well.

[Detroit Red Wings GM]

Eh, I probably wouldn't use it if we did introduce it. Not a bad idea by any means though.

[Lilwayne - Retired Canucks GM]

Mar 20, 2012 14:29:12 GMT -5 Wynne - Retired Flyers GM said:

Nay

We got 500, 500, 500, 500

*Head Nod*

How about 550? 550?

.................is that darrell bidding?...........


(500 going once, 500 going twice, you know i can't tell you that dave, any last bids?)


............YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEUP!


THIS IS THE WOW FACTOR!

[New Jersey Devils GM]

If Yotes is okay with it, I wouldn't be against it.

Wouldn't use good producers though, you gamble ruining their mojo.

[Colorado Avalanche GM]

Up to the person who wants to do it and who they send out. Like Yotes said, it may screw over your good producers though.

Just throwing things out there, something new to try. Iunno.