|
|
Post by Smolik20 - Retired Blues GM on Feb 23, 2011 13:10:39 GMT -5
TO  C Jiri Hudler SNP 81 D Andrej Meszaros TWD 82 LW Viktor Stalberg PWF 77  3rd Round Pick (This Year) TO C Jeff Carter SNP (84) D Steve Montador DFD (79) I accept |
|
|
|
Post by jmcook on Feb 23, 2011 13:13:58 GMT -5
accepted
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Feb 23, 2011 14:25:31 GMT -5
Carter 84, Montador 79 = Meszaros 82, Hudler 81. Why the need for Stalberg and the 3rd...?
|
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Devils GM on Feb 23, 2011 14:42:46 GMT -5
Accept.
|
|
|
|
Post by New York Islanders GM on Feb 23, 2011 15:01:39 GMT -5
take out the 3rd
|
|
|
|
Post by jmcook on Feb 23, 2011 15:05:16 GMT -5
won't be doing it then. Carter will be going up in 2012
|
|
|
|
Post by jmcook on Feb 23, 2011 15:10:04 GMT -5
THis was the original trade. I added Montador for Stalberg
C Jiri Hudler SNP 81
D Andrej Meszaros TWD 82
3rd Round Pick (This Year)
TO
C Jeff Carter SNP (84)
|
|
|
|
Post by Smolik20 - Retired Blues GM on Feb 23, 2011 15:17:29 GMT -5
Carter 84, Montador 79 = Meszaros 82, Hudler 81. Why the need for Stalberg and the 3rd...? How does an 84 and 79 = an 82 and 81? if anything the 82 and 81 = the 84 then the 77 and a 3rd = a 79. Guys all I am trying to do is upgrade on the 2nd line. Its not that outrageous of a deal. |
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Devils GM on Feb 23, 2011 15:31:16 GMT -5
Actually, if anything Stalberg isn't needed.
I still accept it though. We're getting too strict with the trading process, unless a team is getting bent over, unwillingly, I say meh, accept it.
|
|
|
|
Post by New York Islanders GM on Feb 23, 2011 15:52:40 GMT -5
The 77 and a 3rd doesn't equal a 79 lol.
But alright I'll accept.
|
|
|
|
Post by jmcook on Feb 23, 2011 15:54:42 GMT -5
I spent all last year trying to get Stalberg from Calgary then he used him in auctions.So he never came back up in auctions becuase of ratings. It is a 77 player that I am going to play on my team.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lilwayne - Retired Canucks GM on Feb 23, 2011 16:04:20 GMT -5
I'll accept if we become less strict and not reject deals that are 81 overall players for 80 overall players cough yotes cough  lol |
|
|
|
Post by jmcook on Feb 23, 2011 16:11:03 GMT -5
I only did that because we were interupting the draft for a trade that had nothing to do with the draft. I would have accepted after the draft. Just to much going on for me and PIT to interupt the draft for nothing.
|
|
|
|
Post by jmcook on Feb 23, 2011 16:11:51 GMT -5
That is 3 accepts, Finalized
|
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Devils GM on Feb 23, 2011 17:07:36 GMT -5
Only reason I mentioned it was for a laugh. I JUST drafted Foligno and the next line was"Foligno is now traded".
Just sayin'
|
|
lol
