|
|
Post by Elite - Former Oilers GM on Apr 29, 2010 23:30:14 GMT -5
TO  C Ron Francis PLY 91 LW Bobby Hull 92 SNP  -3rd -5th TO C Joe Sakic SNP 92 C Pavel Datsyuk DNG 92  -1st |
|
|
|
Post by Fluffy - Former Senators GM on Apr 29, 2010 23:33:21 GMT -5
I accept. The shake-up continues.
Sakic is a SNP though isn't he?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Apr 29, 2010 23:38:43 GMT -5
Sakic is a SNP, but I don't see how this is fair. Take the 5th out at least.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lilwayne - Retired Canucks GM on Apr 29, 2010 23:40:43 GMT -5
i think the 5th needs to stay lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by Elite - Former Oilers GM on Apr 29, 2010 23:41:34 GMT -5
Its fair hows it not
|
|
|
|
Post by Fluffy - Former Senators GM on Apr 29, 2010 23:48:31 GMT -5
I would gladly take the 5th out lol, but I figured a few eyebrows would have been raised if it wasn't there.
|
|
|
|
Post by jmcook on Apr 30, 2010 6:21:12 GMT -5
accepted
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Apr 30, 2010 13:20:33 GMT -5
Am I missing something here? Sakic/Datsyuk, Francis/Hull, there's a one rating difference. Since it's high 90s players we're talking here, a two-round upgrade (3rd to 1st) makes up that difference and isn't an overpayment (but almost is considering its a 1st). Why is the 5th there?
|
|
|
|
Post by Fluffy - Former Senators GM on Apr 30, 2010 16:22:23 GMT -5
How is it more fair for Yotes to give up the 6th overall pick and downgrade by 1 overall and only get a 3rd in return? That's why the 5th is there (even though it evens out because the guys I'm giving up produce better, but mods go by ratings and not production when evaluating trades, right?).
I'm all for giving up less to make this deal happen lol, but I figured this made sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by C00kies - Retired Kings GM on Apr 30, 2010 18:44:05 GMT -5
I accept.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lilwayne - Retired Canucks GM on Apr 30, 2010 20:17:27 GMT -5
lol pens you are missing out on something  |
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on May 1, 2010 18:36:50 GMT -5
I guess I'll accept this.
Finalized.
|
|
