|
Post by Retired Ducks GM on Nov 22, 2008 18:20:46 GMT -5
Inspired by this , I suggest we add a rule that says if something is in pending for X number of days without both parties accepting, it becomes tossed out. This way, the GMs aren't in pergatory waiting for something to happen for days and days and days and days....
|
|
|
Post by jmcook on Nov 22, 2008 18:21:36 GMT -5
agreed
|
|
|
Post by amar on Nov 22, 2008 19:31:36 GMT -5
Whats Suggestion #4
|
|
|
Post by Tjhaskell - Retired Jets GM on Nov 22, 2008 21:54:54 GMT -5
Agreed, But how many days would we do it for.. 2 ? 3? 4? 5? no more than 5..
|
|
|
Post by 55587crosby on Nov 23, 2008 11:06:40 GMT -5
yeah 5 sounds good
|
|
|
Post by Tjhaskell - Retired Jets GM on Nov 23, 2008 13:18:14 GMT -5
5 days is a long time tho.. i was thinking like 3..
|
|
|
Post by 55587crosby on Nov 23, 2008 13:19:58 GMT -5
No 5. So when poeple are on vacation they can still have enough time
|
|
|
Post by Tjhaskell - Retired Jets GM on Nov 23, 2008 13:19:59 GMT -5
like ... look at that auction deal with dallas and edmonton, its been 3 days and dallas hasnt replied (due to vacation) which is a reasonable excuse to make it 5 days. but if a guy is on here every day, and hasnt accepted a trade he made 3 days ago... then it should just be void.. i dunno, its not up to me anyways
|
|
|
Post by 55587crosby on Nov 23, 2008 13:20:46 GMT -5
5 for vacations and 3 for non vac. That sounds good enough
|
|
|
Post by Tjhaskell - Retired Jets GM on Nov 23, 2008 13:21:41 GMT -5
yeah, that sounds pretty reasonable.
|
|
|
Post by Retired Ducks GM on Nov 23, 2008 18:45:33 GMT -5
I vote 2 days for non-vacation (48 hours - thats quite some time), and 1 day after a person returns from vacation.
|
|
|
Post by Wynne - Retired Flyers GM on Nov 23, 2008 18:51:09 GMT -5
I vote 2 days for non-vacation (48 hours - thats quite some time), and 1 day after a person returns from vacation. I like this idea better. 3 days and 5 days is too long IMO
|
|