|
|
Post by New Jersey Devils GM on Mar 23, 2009 18:19:03 GMT -5
Who cares if they go up in 2010? This is an 09 league, that's completely irrelevant. It's the double standard that is annoying to me, when we made the leage no-cap one of the staff (not me or Oilers) said trades are going to have to be almost even to be accepted. This isn't close to be even. Who said that? |
|
|
|
Post by Wynne - Retired Flyers GM on Mar 23, 2009 18:19:14 GMT -5
Boston said it himself, Alfy will probably go down..
|
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Devils GM on Mar 23, 2009 18:20:14 GMT -5
well I disagree, truly, hes been Ottawa's arguably best player this year.. hes been better than Heatley..
|
|
|
|
Post by jmcook on Mar 23, 2009 18:20:22 GMT -5
Boston only had like 5 good keepers before. He needed some
|
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Red Wings GM on Mar 23, 2009 18:20:26 GMT -5
Boston said they'll go up/down.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nemits - Former Minnesota GM on Mar 23, 2009 18:25:21 GMT -5
Sorry NJ/Bos, but just looking at the breakdown of this deal I cannot accept. I have to reject.
|
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Red Wings GM on Mar 23, 2009 18:26:09 GMT -5
That's 3 rejects (me, Minny, Edmonton, I think)
Rejected and finalized.
|
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Devils GM on Mar 23, 2009 18:28:28 GMT -5
EDM didnt say he rejected
|
|
|
|
Post by Leafs5 - Retired Bruins GM on Mar 23, 2009 18:28:30 GMT -5
I honestly don't see why you people are shooting this down.
I'm also a little confused about why a certain GM that came very close to beating this offer is shooting it down...
Trade mods should be for when someone that doesn't know what they're doing gets fleeced. NJ knows and has said himself he's paying a high price but feels this is worth it.
There's a fine line between stopping completely unfair trades and trying to control everything teams do that I believe is being crossed here.
*shakes head*
|
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Red Wings GM on Mar 23, 2009 18:30:50 GMT -5
We've made it completely clear why were shooting it down, if you're unsure, may I suggest you go back and read the thread over?
|
|
|
|
Post by Leafs5 - Retired Bruins GM on Mar 23, 2009 18:32:53 GMT -5
We've made it completely clear why were shooting it down, if you're unsure, may I suggest you go back and read the thread over? You know what I meant, but since you don't understand implied statements I'll say it this way. I read your reasons, I just do not agree with them. You guys are just looking at the overalls of this deal and tossing it out. Deals should be rejected based on how they impact a team both short and long term. Not by the overalls you see in this thread. |
|
|
|
Post by Leafs5 - Retired Bruins GM on Mar 23, 2009 18:40:27 GMT -5
I need to know what's going on here for a couple other deals so...
what round do you people want the pick upgraded to to put this through?
|
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Red Wings GM on Mar 23, 2009 18:42:06 GMT -5
I'll accept if it's a 1st rounder.
Anything less and my reject sticks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Leafs5 - Retired Bruins GM on Mar 23, 2009 18:43:48 GMT -5
since that's impossible thanks to the old GM throwing away my firsts for 3000 years...
how about if I leave the 5th in there and upgrade to a 2nd?
|
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Red Wings GM on Mar 23, 2009 18:44:29 GMT -5
that's fine.
|
|
