|
|
Post by kruze75 on Jan 10, 2010 4:42:09 GMT -5
TO  C Matt Duchene C SNP 82 D Luke Schenn DFD 82 TO  D Erik Johnson DFD 83 RW Michael Grabner SNP 78 Detroit accepts.
|
|
|
|
Post by Allabouthockey - Former CGY GM on Jan 10, 2010 4:42:51 GMT -5
i accept
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Jan 10, 2010 5:11:19 GMT -5
Rejected, something else needs to go Boston's way to make up for the 3 rating loss.
|
|
|
|
Post by kruze75 on Jan 10, 2010 5:14:46 GMT -5
3 rating loss?? Umm... look at what I'm giving up and what I'm getting... It's more than fair considering the production thus far of all the players involved...
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Jan 10, 2010 5:16:55 GMT -5
It comes down to ratings here, production is a factor but is secondary next to ratings. They're really the only concrete thing trades have ever gone by when looking at if deals are fair or not, it is a game after all.
Judging by the trade in which you acquired Grabner (the Niedermayer deal with Minnesota), and now this one, I think you believe Grabner's value is way higher than it actually is...
|
|
|
|
Post by kruze75 on Jan 10, 2010 5:19:03 GMT -5
I've seen ALOT worse rating differentials go through here...
|
|
|
|
Post by New York Islanders GM on Jan 10, 2010 5:19:57 GMT -5
reject
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Jan 10, 2010 5:20:58 GMT -5
I've seen ALOT worse rating differentials go through here... Show me some trades like this where teams lost 3 ratings or more and went through. |
|
|
|
Post by kruze75 on Jan 10, 2010 5:21:20 GMT -5
You guys are really unbelievable... Seriously...  |
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Jan 10, 2010 5:23:00 GMT -5
If there's another 80 going Boston's way or a 5th I'll accept this.
5th = 80 player, 80+78 (Grabner) = 81 player IMO, and 83, 81 = 82, 82.
|
|
|
|
Post by kruze75 on Jan 10, 2010 5:24:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Jan 10, 2010 5:27:21 GMT -5
I'm still not really sure why you took that deal, honestly. Only thing that made it fair was the fact that Niedermayer is likely done after this season in real life, and you were getting younger talent.
This deal is completely different. You're getting two 19-year old 82s for an 83 an a 78, both in the same age group. Ain't fair, by any stretch.
|
|
|
|
Post by New York Islanders GM on Jan 10, 2010 5:28:38 GMT -5
or he just doesn't know what he's doing...
IMO this is what the trade is like
Johnson>Schenn
Duchene>>>>>Grabner
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Jan 10, 2010 5:29:31 GMT -5
Isles hit the nail on the head there. Toss in what I suggested to even up the ratings or this won't go through. I guarantee you that there will be no staff accepts of this trade otherwise.
|
|
|
|
Post by kruze75 on Jan 10, 2010 5:29:36 GMT -5
I'm still not really sure why you took that deal, honestly. Only thing that made it fair was the fact that Niedermayer is likely done after this season in real life, and you were getting younger talent. This deal is completely different. You're getting two 19-year old 82s for an 83 an a 78, both in the same age group. Ain't fair, by any stretch. You asked me for a trade that went through that the ratings differential was similar or greater and I provided... Now, suddenly there's a differential when you see fit? |
|
