|
Post by Nemits - Former Minnesota GM on Dec 13, 2010 19:56:26 GMT -5
What if instead of releasing all 5 legends in the first 5 auctions, we do the first 4, in the first 4, but save the 5th for the final auction of the year?
Makes the final one more interesting, could be a game changer for a team on the bubble, and then the next season we start the auctions off stronger too.
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Dec 13, 2010 19:57:11 GMT -5
I'm a fan.
|
|
|
Post by Wynne - Retired Flyers GM on Dec 13, 2010 19:58:55 GMT -5
Not a bad idea, I'm all for.
|
|
|
Post by Nemits - Former Minnesota GM on Dec 13, 2010 20:00:19 GMT -5
Yeah I was just sitting here thinking about how much I don't care about the last auction set and how we could make it more interesting
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Devils GM on Dec 13, 2010 20:01:44 GMT -5
Terrible idea, why would you even suggest such an idiotic idea? I kid of course. Solid idea.
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Red Wings GM on Dec 13, 2010 20:06:11 GMT -5
I for one think we have too many legends as it is right now, but seeing as I'm probably in the minority and that we're not going to stop bringing in new legends, I like this idea.
|
|
|
Post by Lilwayne - Retired Canucks GM on Dec 13, 2010 20:15:16 GMT -5
sure..so that would mean we`d basically have 2 88 players for the start of next years auction right...it does make the auctions stronger i guess.
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs GM on Dec 13, 2010 20:55:23 GMT -5
Let's do it.
|
|
|
Post by New York Islanders GM on Dec 13, 2010 21:10:58 GMT -5
I enjoy this idea. Let's do it.
|
|
|
Post by Nemits - Former Minnesota GM on Dec 13, 2010 21:34:59 GMT -5
Yay Wild.
|
|
|
Post by Lilwayne - Retired Canucks GM on Dec 13, 2010 22:06:02 GMT -5
psssh i thought of that...just never said anything about it ;D
|
|
|
Post by Nemits - Former Minnesota GM on Dec 13, 2010 23:20:54 GMT -5
Ya okay
|
|