|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins GM on Jul 13, 2013 23:31:56 GMT -5
 1.  61-17-4-126 2.  45-33-4-94 3.  42-30-10-94 4.  54-24-4-112 5.  54-25-3-111 6.  42-34-6-90 7.  37-30-15-89 8.  39-33-10-88 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9.  38-36-8-84 10.  37-35-10-84 11.  35-40-7-77 12.  34-40-8-76 13.  32-39-11-75 14.  33-42-7-73 15.  29-41-12-70  1.  59-19-4-122 2.  58-19-5-121 3.  44-35-3-91 4,  46-29-7-99 5.  45-30-7-97 6.  41-29-12-94 7.  43-34-5-91 8.  41-34-7-89 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9.  38-38-6-82 10.  39-40-3-81 11.  35-41-6-76 12.  34-40-8-76 13.  34-42-6-74 14.  31-42-9-71 15.  30-42-10-70 |
|
|
|
Post by San Jose Sharks GM on Jul 14, 2013 1:06:36 GMT -5
bad
|
|
|
|
Post by Lilwayne - Retired Canucks GM on Jul 14, 2013 6:04:34 GMT -5
Sweet.
|
|
|
|
Post by New Jersey Devils GM on Jul 14, 2013 11:06:55 GMT -5
PLayoffs? Yay
|
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs GM on Jul 15, 2013 12:45:51 GMT -5
beating the Bruins.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tampa Bay Lightning GM on Jul 22, 2013 3:37:44 GMT -5
Nice, climbed into a playoff spot with games in hand.
|
|
|
|
Post by Columbus Blue Jackets GM on Jul 22, 2013 6:07:26 GMT -5
that's more like it
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Bruins GM on Jul 22, 2013 11:31:54 GMT -5
Not any more Laughs...oops, I mean Leafs.
We both suck.
|
|
|
|
Post by San Jose Sharks GM on Jul 22, 2013 15:41:22 GMT -5
not goood
|
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Avalanche GM on Jul 22, 2013 17:23:55 GMT -5
Barely.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tororella91 - Former Preds GM on Jul 26, 2013 15:34:56 GMT -5
oh god....
|
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Avalanche GM on Jul 26, 2013 15:42:45 GMT -5
Cool, I like it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Bruins GM on Jul 26, 2013 18:13:07 GMT -5
Getting better.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs GM on Jul 29, 2013 11:00:20 GMT -5
At least im higher than the Habs. lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Avalanche GM on Aug 4, 2013 11:26:45 GMT -5
Not bad.
|
|
