|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins GM on Jan 20, 2012 2:01:31 GMT -5
D Shea Weber DFD 89
C Eric Lindros PWF 88
C Petr Cajanek PLY 81
RW Marek Svatos SNP 81
C Angelo Esposito PLY 74
RW Ben Smith SNP 74
for
RW Dino Ciccarelli SNP 88*Legend*
RW Ryan Callahan GRN 84
C Dave Bolland TWF 84
D Niklas Kronwall TWD 83
D Dan Girardi TWD 82
I thought I was helping Colorado out, But apparently not. Sorry
|
|
|
|
Post by Lilwayne - Retired Canucks GM on Jan 20, 2012 2:05:00 GMT -5
You should let all staffers decide. I just voiced my opinion on how he was improving his bottom 6 forwards by trading his top D-man. I thought it wasn't a smart maneuver. Maybe it was, just one opinion out of 30 in the league.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins GM on Jan 20, 2012 2:08:36 GMT -5
Yours and Winnipegs. I am fine with it. I have dismantled Championships teams to make sure I didn't win to keep this league going. I not going to start now having people think I'm cheating somebody.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins GM on Jan 20, 2012 2:14:06 GMT -5
But just becuase a player is rated something, that doesn't make him a top 6 forward. There are an awful lot of 83-84 players that can't play there. Both Callahan and Bolland can. Kronwall has been a top line defenseman for StLouis for many years with great production. Giradi repalces a 75 defenseman that has to start for him as Chorney is his 6th Defenseman. Weber has played an average of 65 games in NHL12 and Ciccarelli has scored 40+ both years in NHL12. I guess I just don't see it. I wanted to help him. Don't try and steal Weber now though. It will be hard to get him now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lilwayne - Retired Canucks GM on Jan 20, 2012 5:26:21 GMT -5
lol I don't trade much...and it should be hard to get Weber. Once again, you seem quite reliant on the first two responses to your trade. Another thing is, how are we supposed to know what each player gets points wise. We just see him giving away a 89 Dman and 88 Forward for a 88 Forward + forwards that are rated equivalently to 8 others on his team Forward wise and Defense that would help his bottom pairings.
Once again, I may be seeing this all wrong, my opinion is my opinion. I wonder what the others think. If I am seeing it all wrong, re-post it... i accepted it anyways the first time around ratings wise, just not smart strategic wise in MY opinion.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wynne - Retired Flyers GM on Jan 20, 2012 12:24:23 GMT -5
Yeah, that's the thing Yotes, you know who does and can do what in the game, unfortunately, we don't. When we look at trades, the only thing we go by is name and overall, which we maybe shouldn't be doing, but that's all we can really go by.
I know you wouldn't go out trying to rip someone off, even if the overalls may look off, odds are, you're giving away the better players.
But this is all for not, the Colorado GM is the same guy as last time.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tjhaskell - Retired Jets GM on Jan 20, 2012 14:02:46 GMT -5
Just for the record, I said "Damn" Because it was a major trade lol I never said that I didn't like it lol
I actually left for a few minutes and then was coming back to say that it was alright but it was already rejected and deleted.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2012 17:48:06 GMT -5
Was this before me?
|
|
|
|
Post by Nemits - Former Minnesota GM on Feb 5, 2012 18:02:08 GMT -5
Did you make that trade? No? Then it was before you.
Dumb shit -.-
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2012 18:04:15 GMT -5
:/
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Feb 5, 2012 18:05:57 GMT -5
He has a good point Cor hahah |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2012 18:09:04 GMT -5
I know.....
|
|
|
|
Post by Nemits - Former Minnesota GM on Feb 5, 2012 18:40:06 GMT -5
He has a good point Cor hahah  |
|
|
|
Post by Tjhaskell - Retired Jets GM on Feb 5, 2012 23:54:54 GMT -5
Did you make that trade? No? Then it was before you. Dumb shit -.- Easy there man, you're turning me on with all the hostility. |
|
