|
|
Post by C00kies - Retired Kings GM on Jan 26, 2010 18:12:16 GMT -5
I said cap league to tie it up  If you do start a cap, but decide that it's better to go no cap, you can, if you start off no-cap and want to change it to cap, you can't because it will fuck many teams over. Having a cap kind of keeps a balance. I wouldn't mind being a PR either (just saw Cor's post above)  |
|
|
|
Post by jmcook on Jan 26, 2010 18:15:54 GMT -5
It kills me when PR's waive a NTC over and over again. I think you might get them to waive more than once.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wynne - Retired Flyers GM on Jan 26, 2010 18:25:55 GMT -5
That would be my exact reasoning for not having a PR. It doesn't make a league more realistic, at all IMHO. Sure you have NTC/NMC's being used but how realistic is it that the same player waives his clause 4 times in a month? None whatsoever. Same thing goes with signings/re-signings. From my experience with a PR, you will only get the player if you offer the most money and offer a NTC/NMC in the deal. Sure it's not the same everywhere, but usually it is, which I don't like.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fluffy - Former Senators GM on Jan 26, 2010 18:33:26 GMT -5
If you did decide to go with a Cap league, I wouldn't mind being a PR. I think it can really add to the realism if done right (which it often isn't, but hey I'd like to try lol).
But for the record, I voted no cap.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Jan 26, 2010 18:40:13 GMT -5
Cap gets impossible to manage after a view years, and also means no legends, keeper draft, etc. In this new era of game they're really hard to run, which is why our site switched.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lilwayne - Retired Canucks GM on Jan 26, 2010 18:42:52 GMT -5
no cap ftw lol but do ur legends thing like u did in ur old league so everyone has a legend
|
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Jan 26, 2010 19:08:06 GMT -5
If the league is cap, it needs a PR. Free agency and stuff is a fucking gong show without one.
|
|
|
|
Post by Allabouthockey - Former CGY GM on Jan 26, 2010 19:11:38 GMT -5
yeah i would have to agree with pens
|
|
|
|
Post by C00kies - Retired Kings GM on Jan 26, 2010 19:41:09 GMT -5
You don't need legends and rookies (maybe 1 draft) in a cap league. Free agency is nuts (more exciting than no cap). Because NHL 10 (assuming that's what you are using) has no-cap, it's easy to move guys around, so you just have to watch the cap in the league.
|
|
|
|
Post by jmcook on Jan 26, 2010 20:54:00 GMT -5
I love the Cap leagues. You really have to think about where you spend you money. You have to be a real Manager. You can always build a contender out of nothing with a cap. I am dieing to see a good cap league.
|
|
|
|
Post by manameis on Jan 26, 2010 21:09:52 GMT -5
cant wait till the year where all the video games coming out suck so I can finally buy an NHL game and go back to simming  if only nhl 09 had simming  |
|
|
|
Post by The Admin Account on Jan 26, 2010 21:37:48 GMT -5
Philly, I'm all for a cap league, but if you do it, it's gotta have a PR.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wynne - Retired Flyers GM on Jan 26, 2010 21:39:29 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure I wouldn't go with a PR if it is cap. I would figure something out for Free Agency and everything else, I've already got some ideas, but I really don't see it having a PR.
|
|
|
|
Post by jmcook on Jan 26, 2010 21:46:48 GMT -5
you have acouple guys that are volunteering to be the PR. Just comunicate with them what you would like to see. If you all have the goals for the league it should work
|
|
|
|
Post by Lilwayne - Retired Canucks GM on Jan 26, 2010 21:47:15 GMT -5
or No cap lol
|
|
If you do start a cap, but decide that it's better to go no cap, you can, if you start off no-cap and want to change it to cap, you can't because it will fuck many teams over. Having a cap kind of keeps a balance. I wouldn't mind being a PR either (just saw Cor's post above) 
if only nhl 09 had simming 